Complete list of high school football scores

New Search Area for Flight 370 is ‘Most Credible Lead’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

(Photo Credit: MGN Online)

(CNN) — Nearly three weeks after the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, the focus of the hunt for the missing passenger jet has moved yet again.

Search teams shifted to a different part of the southern Indian Ocean after Australian authorities said they received “a new credible lead” about the jetliner’s most likely last movements.

An analysis of radar data led investigators to move the search to an area 1,100 kilometers (680 miles) to the northeast of where efforts had been focused previously, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority said Friday.

It described the new information, which indicated the errant jetliner didn’t fly as far south as previously thought, as “the most credible lead to where debris may be located.”

That means the huge, isolated areas of the ocean that ships and planes had combed for more than a week — and where various satellites detected objects that might be debris from the missing plane — are no longer of interest.

“We have moved on from those search areas,” said John Young, general manager of emergency response for the Australian maritime authority.

The big change of geographic focus is the latest twist in an investigation that has so far failed to establish why Flight 370 flew dramatically off course or exactly where the plane and the 239 people it was carrying ended up.

“To me, it’s not a game changer, it’s a reset,” David Gallo of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution said of the shifted search. But he added that he was “glad that things are progressing.”

‘We have not seen any debris’

Australian officials also played down the significance of hundreds of possible objects detected by satellites in the previous search region, some of which had been described by authorities as important leads.

“In regards to the old areas, we have not seen any debris,” Young said at a news briefing in Canberra, the Australian capital. “And I would not wish to classify any of the satellite imagery as debris, nor would I want to classify any of the few visual sightings that we made as debris. That’s just not justifiable from what we have seen.”

Officials had repeatedly cautioned that the objects seen in the satellite imagery could just be flotsam that had fallen off cargo ships.

But some analysts raised their eyebrows at the search coordinators’ readiness to move away from the satellite sightings.

“Really? That much debris and we’re not going to have a look at it to see what that stuff might be?” said Gallo, who helped lead the search for the flight recorders of Air France Flight 447, which crashed into the Atlantic Ocean in 2009.

Others lamented the amount of time, money and resources that were spent sending planes and ships out to the now discounted areas for more than a week.

“This is time that has been wasted, there’s no question,” said CNN aviation analyst Miles O’Brien.

But Young disputed that suggestion, saying the previous searches were based on the information authorities “had at the time.”

“That’s nothing unusual for search and rescue operations,” he said “And this actually happens to us all the time — that new information may arise out of sequence with the search itself.”

Plane traveled faster

The latest data, based on an analysis of radar on the night Flight 370 disappeared, suggest the aircraft was traveling faster than previously estimated before it dropped off radar, Australian authorities said.

The radar data concerns the phase of the flight during which the plane turned off its original path over the South China Sea and headed west over the Malay Peninsula out into the Strait of Malacca, authorities said.

The faster speed means the plane is thought to have burned more fuel than previously calculated, shortening the possible distance it flew south into the Indian Ocean.

CNN safety analyst David Soucie said it was “a good sign” that international aviation experts analyzing the radar and satellite data related to the plane had adjusted their assumptions.

“Assumptions are the key to all of this,” he said. “If you assume something and you end up with a final conclusion, you have to constantly review that.”

Less remote, better weather

The new search area is closer to the Australian continent, allowing planes to spend longer flying over it as they hunt for traces of the missing passenger jet, which disappeared March 8 over Southeast Asia.

“We will certainly get better time on scene,” Young said.

The new zone is also farther north, moving search teams away from latitudes known for difficult weather conditions. Search efforts in the old areas were disrupted twice this week by bad weather.

Conditions in the more northerly zone are “likely to be better more often than we’ve seen in the past,” Young said.

They may also be better for taking satellite images, he said. The Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation has directed satellites to capture images of the new zone.

But the area is question remains vast — roughly 319,000 square kilometers (123,000 square miles) — and remote — about 1,850 kilometers (1,150 miles) west of Perth, the western Australian city that’s the hub for search operations.

Ten search aircraft will fly over the area over the course of Friday. Six ships involved in the search — one Australian and five Chinese — are headed there, too.

7 comments

  • george valachi

    After 3 weeks and no one has actually looked at any of the debris that was found I can’t help but think the music from the 3 stooges should be playing through this news article.

    Come on, 3 weeks and no one has even looked at the debris from less than 100 miles away?

  • April

    I agree. But also, the saying “no news is good news” does NOT APPLY to this story. Why don’t you people stop reporting the fact that you can’t find it over and over with the SAME INFORMATION!! This headline is not a story. We read it 72x this week alone. “SOME OF US” actually CARE about that planes passengers and all your doing is stringing us stringing us asking with fake coverage. It’s annoying. You can’t fill in gaps of news with fake news to appease us. How about you write, “plane still missing, prayers still needed as we can’t check debris”. That would solve this annoying charade. I personally know I keep reading these for some hope of finding these peoplebutclose out of the article mad every time because your coverage on this story is soooooooooo redundant on its information.

    • April

      Sorry to commenters having to read all of my errors. Was a little mad and didn’t proof read before I sent it from my phone. I just don’t understand why no one in the news room or our country seem to be taking this story seriously. I feel everyone is messing up this search. And further more the satellite images they keep finding are probably tips from the public that is searching the data records. It’s almost like the “citizens” are the only ones really upset about this.

  • Spaz's Sprinkles

    So basically what they are saying is, after 3 weeks- they still have NO idea where the plane went! This may be too soon and it may seem insensitive to some but… I see a movie on this in the future. “The Plane That Vanished into Thin Air”.

  • Tim

    I wonder how truthful the Malaysian government is about its knowledge of what happened? No trace of anything, no debris, nothing. Maybe the plane didn’t go down. Maybe it’s a lot closer than we realize. Maybe they should look closer at the airport it came from.

  • stay136

    Didn’t they tell the families of the passengers that the passengers all died? If so how can they do such a thing without proof?

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.